LINKS — re: LAW and the COMMON LAW (revised 11/18/2014)

LINKS – re: LAW and the COMMON LAW

Freedom and Common Law Web Sites

(on http://JohnHenryHill.Wordpress.com )

(as of 11/18/2014 )

 First, I will presume that you have already downloaded as PDF files the following:

++++++++++++++++++++

 The following list is NOT complete, as there are literally hundreds of law school libraries and thousands of relevant law web sites, But this is a start:

 www.1215.org – – BILL THORNTON’s “Law Notes” site on the COMMON LAW (theory, history and practical application in courts today) – this is THE BEST web site on the Common Law!!! 

www.law.cornell.eduCornell Law School’s “Legal Information Institute– Fantastic !!!

 http://Freedom-School.com   – Incredibly FANTASTIC Library of Law articles !!!!!

 http://SEDM.org  – HUGE library of information

 www.BarefootsWorld.net     – Don’t let the name fool you; Huge Library of Articles on Freedom

 www.USA-the-Republic.com      – great law articles

 http://SupremeLaw.org/library/index.htm – Paul Mitchell’s “Supreme Law Library” – Fantastic

 http://FamGuardian.org   – a STUNNINGLY MASSIVE Library on Law and Freedom

 www.USAvsUS.info   – U.S.A. versus Corporate U.S. – History and Information

 www.LawfulPath.com   – Its Reading Room page is a masterpiece of essays, important documents, etc. at: www.lawfulpath.com/index.php?p=Reading-Room&i=0     In addition, the “Springboard” page provides the reader with a list of useful LINKS to other sites: www.lawfulpath.com/index.php?p=Springboard&i=0#lr

 www.FreedomPool.org – Freedom Library  

 www.AdmiraltyLawGuide.com   – Admiralty Law Guide      

http://supremelaw.org/cc/index.htm    – Index of Court Cases by Case Names

 www.SSRN.com   – Must search for appropriate articles

www.USAvsUS.info — Freedom & Sovereignty

www.PLOL.org/Pages/Search.aspx – Public Library of Law

http://constitution.org – U.S. Constitution

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php – Library of Congress (Thomas section)

www.supremecourt.gov – U.S. Supreme Court

http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.comIncredibly fantastic and well-researched articles published by some using the title eowyndbh , but always with attribution to (For Frank ‘Austin’ England III)

www.Ecclesia.org – a semi-religious web site, but with excellent information in its The Roman World section

NOTE: One could spend YEARS studying the articles and referenced articles on EACH ONE of the above web sites alone. Together, they provide links to perhaps hundreds of thousands of articles, if not millions.

www.BuildFreedom.com – contained some great documents and articles, but no longer functions

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

www.SSRN.com   – Must search for appropriate articles

www.OnPower.org/quotes/quotes.html – Quotes on Power

www.globalresearch.ca/who-owns-the-federal-reserve/10489 – Federal Reserve

http://mculta.daisydoor.net – about Common Law Name Changes

www.ushistory.org – superficial, but you have to start somewhere…

http://SupremeLaw.org/cc/jetruman/index.htm – Court Cases – “Selected Works of John Everyman Trumane”

www.RepublicOfTheUnitedStates.org – BILL FOUST’s plan for restoring the American Republic (before he was murdered at his home by a police officer)

www.ImportanceOfPhilosophy.com/Politics_Rights.html

www.justia.com – Law and Legal Information for Law Students

www.nolo.com/dictionary – Law dictionary

www.oyez.org   – latest U.S. Supreme Court stuff

www.lectlaw.com   -‘Lectric Law Library

http://libertyfight.com/archives/quotes.html – QUOTES – stick to this one page; the rest of the web site is “nuts”

www.WhoOwnsTheWorld.comAre you not just a bit curious?

www.abodia.com/court/files/Challenge%20Jurisdiction.htm – challenging Jurisdiction

www.abodia.com/court – other minor court stuff

www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm – special article (example of what you can find if you dig deep enough)

www.usa-the-republic.com/items%20of%20interest/trial_by_jury/Introduction.html – a book by Lysander Spooner; plus ANY other writings by Lysander Spooner

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEOS

There are some well-done videos online – a few even contain accurate information!

The four (4) series of videos I personally prefer are all on www.YouTube.com .

1.) Videos of Bill Thornton’s lectures: www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bill+thornton

Do NOT rely only on a search on “Bill Thornton”, since many videos have been removed, then later re-posted by other people without mentioning the name “Bill Thornton”. Bill Thornton discusses in great detail how to file a “Counter-Claim”(turning you from a “defendant” into a “Plaintiff”) well in advance of any court hearing and how to establish and maintain YOUR OWN COURT as a true “court of record” operating SOLELY under the Common Law. Bill’s videos are THE BEST in term of theory, history and practical application in a court room!

2.) Videos of Bill Turner’s lectures: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l0BTV06s9A&list=PLjvSX3DDjLq3k5ZnzbLoYM6HV-0wTYrMs

3.) Videos of Karl Lentz’s interviews (as he seldom gives lectures):

www.youtube.com/results?search_query=karl+lentz

4.) Videos of SIMON, aka El Spaniardo’s” lectures: www.youtube.com/results?search_query=el+spaniardo

He also posts videos under the name of WhiteRabbitTrust”: www.youtube.com/user/WhiteRabbitTrust

Simon’s best lectures involve the Common Law and Maritime-Admiralty law (Contract law; Commercial law), where he stands next to large white sheets of paper and writes down notes. His “phone calls” and other phone interviews are usually disasters. His lectures on “Common Law Liens” or “Commercial Liens” are among the BEST I have ever seen or read!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

VIDEOS to AVOID

1.) Videos by Marc Stevens. I think his concept of the Common Law is far too narrow; and I am not sure if he knows the difference between the Common Law, Equity law and Maritime-Admiralty law   -– which are the ONLY three types of law allowed under the U.S. Constitution. Further, Mr. Stevens always seems to concentrate on demanding the judge prove “jurisdiction” before proceeding further I court.

What Mr. Steven does NOT appear to recognize is that, UNLESS he files well BEFORE any court hearing a Counter-Claim under the Common Law (thereby making himself or his “client” the PLAINTIFF) challenging the court’s Equity or Maritime-Admiralty jurisdiction, he or his client has already LOST by the time they show up in court. A “defendant” can NOT simply show up in a judge’s court operating under Maritime-Admiralty jurisdiction and then demand that the judge “prove” he has jurisdiction! Simply by showing up in court (without filing a Counter-Claim as above as a plaintiff in a REBUTTAL to the court’s PRESUMPTION of Maritime-Admiralty jurisdiction), the “defendant” has “agreed” to the court’s Maritime-Admiralty jurisdiction by default. And like the captain of a ship, once you aboard the captain’s (judge’s) ship, the captain (judge) is in complete control of all that happens on his ship (court). Once in court, the former “defendant (now the “plaintiff” in his Counter-Claim should let his documents stand by themselves and should say NOTHIING of substance to anyone, other than to state repeatedly, “My documents filed with my Counter-Claim explain everything as best as I can ever explain it. I have nothing else to add.”

The result is that although Mr. Stevens’ arguments re: proving jurisdiction have real merit under law, he does NOT understand the proper procedures and times for challenging the judge’s jurisdiction; and therefore Mr. Steven’s “client” appear to lose more often than not. (Mr. Stevens should study the work of Bill Thornton (above) regarding filing a Counter-Claim as a Plaintiff in which one challenges jurisdiction.)

2.) Videos by Robert Menard of Canada are very interesting and often very accurate (especially re: the Common Law), However, like Mr. Stevens, he appears to lack sufficient knowledge of Equity law and Maritime-Admiralty law (Commercial law, Contract law, Law Merchant) under which almost ALL lower courts operate AND therefore the proper procedures of filing well in advance a Counter-Claim (making oneself the “Plaintiff” as opposed to the “defendant”), as described above for Mr. Marc Stevens.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. Hello Dr. Hill,

    I am an 80, retired Mechanical Contractor and service provider and have been trained as a paralegal; ABA-approved two year Associate Degree. I found your site today. I have been studying these matters since about 1994. I was the constable of the Santa Fe Township…now defunct. I was also a Captain, G-2, New Mexico Militia.
    By the presence of the American Civil flag, I presume you are familiar with the work of Anna von Reitz et al.

    I am working on a film, United States—Tyranny by Fraud. I am looking for interviews for the film.
    Are you interested in contributing to this film? What is your location?

    james-osbourne: holmes II

    1. Dear James, 10/18/2016

      I was born and raised in Massachusetts (as were my parents, grand-parents, etc.) – not too far from Concord and Lexington. I am in my mid-60’s now, but have been an almost “fanatical” American “history buff” since about age 5 – and I read just about EVERYTHING in that field that I can lay my hands on! (My wife sometimes complains that I read all the time – at least 8-10 hours each day; and perhaps she is right, but I simply love this stuff.)

      I left the U.S. FOREVER in 2010 and live in Europe with homes in various countries As the “ABOUT ME” page of my LAW BLOG states, “JohnHenryHill” is a PEN NAME I use to to keep the U.S. government off my back. (See my post about “DONUTS and the CIS” – it will help explain why.) (ALL the other information in “ABOUT ME” is factual.)

      I thank you for your offer, but must decline for 3 reasons: (1) I do NOT want to draw the attention of the U.S. government. I have been through enough and they are still giving me a hard time – now blocking asset transfers from the U.S. to my banks in Europe – for NO reason that they will give to my U.S. lawyer!
      (2) The U.S. is NOT the America in which I grew up! To be honest, I now consider the U.S. a “police state” and a near-dictatorship. Elections will change NOTHING. When has any U.S. election EVER improved the people’s live or resulted in a smaller, less intrusive government? I believe they are “shows” put on so people will THINK they have some voice in government
      (3.) I consider the U.S. (the America I knew) to be a “lost cause” – dead and buried; and never to rise again. As Jefferson wrote, there should be a revolution every 20 years or so – and he was right: a true ARMED REVOLUTION is the only thing, I believe, that MIGHT restore America to a constitutional republic. But it will NOT happen – the people would rather watch football than fight for their freedom. Further, even if there were a revolution, the “money-class” would soon regain control of the government and the people.

      As Sir Josiah Stamp wrote:
      “Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.”
      – Sir Josiah Stamp, Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928). Reputed to be the 2nd wealthiest man in England at that time.

      JohnHenryHill@Yahoo.com

      1. Thank you. I very much appreciate what you are doing to inform people here of their reality.
        Be well.

        james-osbourne: holmes II

    2. A native-born American, I left the U.S. permanently in 2010 (planning began in 2007) and now live in eastern Europe with homes in several countries. There is MUCH MORE FREEDOM in these countries (especially Russia, Crimea and southern Ukraine) than in the U.S. in 2010. Seriously!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: