The Three Flags of the United States of America – You have been warned!

The THREE Flags of the United States of America —

You have been warned!

by John-Henry Hill, M.D.

March 30, 2013

Revised: July 15, 2017

The REAL American Flag —plus other U.S. Flags you commonly see in the U.S. — with PROOF      7/15/2017

July 19, 2015 · by JohnHenryHill · in Original Articles · 3 Comments ·Edit

The REAL American Flag

by John-Henry Hill, M.D.

7/19/2015 and 7/15/2017

PREFACE: One commentator stated that my essay was all myth, especially about the U.S. Civil Flag of Peacetime and the fact that it had VERTICAL stripes – as opposed to horizontal stripes on “Old Glory”. I will now present PROOF of my statements; and thus display the arrogant ignorance of that commentator.

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, published in 1850 before the War Between The States has this description of the U.S. Civil Flag in the introduction, “The Custom House”

Start of Quote from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter

“. . . Here, with a view from its front windows adown this not very enlivening prospect, and thence across the harbour, stands a spacious edifice of brick. From the loftiest point of its roof, during precisely three and a half hours of each forenoon, floats or droops, in breeze or calm, the banner of the republic; but with the thirteen stripes turned VERTICALLY, instead of horizontally, and thus indicating that a civil, and not a military, post of Uncle Sam’s government is here established. Its front is ornamented with a portico of half-a-dozen wooden pillars, supporting a balcony, beneath which a flight of wide granite steps descends towards the street Over the entrance hovers an enormous specimen of the American eagle, with outspread wings, a shield before her breast, and, if I recollect aright, a bunch of intermingled thunder- bolts and barbed arrows in each claw. With the customary infirmity of temper that characterizes this unhappy fowl, she appears by the fierceness of her beak and eye, and the general truculency of her attitude, to threaten mischief to the inoffensive community; and especially to warn all citizens careful of their safety against intruding on the premises which she overshadows with her wings. Nevertheless, vixenly as she looks, many people are seeking at this very moment to shelter themselves under the wing of the federal eagle; imagining, I presume, that her bosom has all the softness and snugness of an eiderdown pillow. But she has no great tenderness even in her best of moods, and, sooner or later — oftener soon than late — is apt to fling off her nestlings with a scratch of her claw, a dab of her beak, or a rankling wound from her barbed arrows.”

End of Quote by Nathaniel Hawthorne in The Scarlet Letter

Before 1940, no U.S. flag, civil or military, flew within the forty-eight states except in federal settings and installations. Only state flags did. Since the 1935 institution of Social Security and the Buck Act of 1940, 4 U.S.C.S. Ch. 4 Sec. 104-113, by clever legal maneuvers the feds have entirely circumvented the U.S. Constitution, and have overlaid federal territorial jurisdiction on the sovereign States, bringing them under the admiralty/military jurisdiction of Law Merchant, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the law of Creditors and Debtors.

Since then the U.S. military flag appears beside, or in place of, the state flags in nearly all locations within the states. All of the state courts and even the municipal ones now openly display it. In the last half century they have more openly declared the military/admiralty law jurisdiction with the addition of the gold fringe to the flag, the military flag of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

Such has been the path that has brought us under the Law of the Military Flag. This should have raised serious questions from many citizens long ago, but we’ve been educated to listen and believe what we are told, not to ask questions, or think for ourselves and search for the truth.

Salem_Custom_House_1850__Paint

Salem_Custom_House_circa_1900__Paint

END OF PREFACE of 7/15/2017

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Start of Original Essay

The next time you walk into a courtroom or other government building in America, take notice of the American flag. In most instances the flag will be the so-called “Stars-and-Stripes” flag with gold-fringe. Just what does this gold-fringe mean? If you think the golf-fringe is merely a decorative addition, then you need to do some research on the “Law of the Flag” and international maritime law.

First, the REAL “United States Civil Flag of Peacetime” is NOT the familiar “stars-and-stripes” flag, either with or without the gold-fringe. The REAL “U.S. Civil Flag of Peacetime” contains blue stars on a white background, with vertical, alternating red and white stripes. This flag signifies that that the Common Law (the “Law of the Land”) and the Constitution remain in effect.

us_civil_flag_of_peacetime__Extensive_Notes_2

us_civil_flag_of_peacetime_Displayed_AFTER_END_of_world_war_1_cap_1

Before 1940, NO United States flag, either civil or military, routinely flew over state government and private buildings within the forty-eight states, except in federal non-military settings and on federal military installations. Only individual STATE flags normally flew over most non-federal government and private buildings in America. And within the various states, when the “U.S. Civil Flag of Peacetime” was flown, it traditionally flew SOLELY over federal, non-military buildings, such as post offices and federal non-military buildings within the states.

The familiar “star and stripes” flag is actually the “U.S. Military Flag of Peacetime”, in which the Common Law (the “Law of the Land”) and the Constitution remain in effect for CIVILIANS (non-military personnel) within the various states, except for U.S. MILITARY installations and U.S. Territories where military law is in effect., as well as U.S. ships as the ship’s Ensign to identify its nationality under Maritime Law.

us_military_flag__territorial_or_ensign_of_peacetime_Extensive_Notes_1

It was traditionally flown over U.S. military buildings during peacetime and federal buildings within the territories (which operate under martial law) . Thus, in the photo below we see two flags displayed outside a U.S. Customs house in Alaska in 1997. The bottom U.S. Customs flag (a modified U.S. CIVIL Flag of Peacetime) signifies to American civilians that the RIGHTS guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution remain in effect. The top flag (the U.S. MILITARY Flag of Peacetime) signifies to foreigners entering the U.S. that they may be subject to administrative, military law of peacetime with limited or no protections under the Constitution.

us_military-territorial_&_civil_flags_of_peacetime._Flown_together__Extenisve_Notes_1

On the seas (the oceans and navigable rivers) the law is very different: it is variously called “Maritime Law”, “Law Merchant”, “Admiralty Law” and “Commercial Law” in which the Common Law and the Constitution do NOT apply.  It is administrative in nature, rather than judicial. In the early and mid-1900’s the Common Law in America was slowly replaced by statutory commercial law – in fact, the entire U.S. Code was replaced by the Uniform Commercial Code (called the UCC), thereby divorcing all U.S. statutory law from the Common Law and tying it instead to Maritime-Admiralty-Commercial Law in which you have NO rights; only privileges granted to you by the government. (Since the 1935 institution of Social Security and the Buck Act of 1940, 4 U.S.C.S. Ch. 4 Sec. 104-113,  the federal government has  entirely circumvented the U.S. Constitution, and has overlaid federal territorial jurisdiction on the sovereign States, bringing them under the admiralty/military jurisdiction of Law Merchant, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the law of Creditors and Debtors.) Under the international Law of the Flag, the gold-fringed U.S. Military flag signifies that one is entering maritime-admiralty jurisdiction equivalent to military law (martial law) during wartime.

us_military_flag_of_war__Extensive_Notes__cap_1

To illustrate the jurisdictional implications signified by the various flags, under Common Law a “trial by jury” is a RIGHT and the jury’s verdict is absolute and final. Under Commercial Law, a “jury trial” (NOT a “trial by jury”) is a PRIVILEGE, which may – or may not – be granted to you. And even if you are granted a jury trial, the jury’s verdict is considered to be ADVISORY only upon the judge – who (like the captain of a ship) can do whatever he wants to you. Just try and get a jury trial to contest a traffic ticket !!!!  Under Common Law you would be guaranteed a trial by jury before ANY fine or sentence could be imposed. Under Commercial Law you are NOT guaranteed a jury trial – only a “bench trial” before an administrative judge; NOT a judge sitting in a true judicial capacity. Indeed, the very word “bench” is derived from “BANK”, since in ancient Rome and later Britain, the bankers sat on a bench behind a platform or table. So the judge, acting in an administrative, non-judicial capacity, sits on the “bench” for the bank to collect money from you (the “debtor”) for the government corporation (the “creditor”). Commercial courts deal only in commerce with creditors and debtors!  This administrator-judge acts as both judge and jury, NOT to decide if you (the “debtor”) are guilty or innocent, but rather to consider HOW MUCH you need to pay the “creditor” (the government as a corporation).

Therefore, when the “stars and stripes” flag has GOLD-FRINGE, it is the “U.S. Military Flag of War” signifying martial law or territorial law or maritime-admiralty/commercial law – meaning that Common Law rights and the U.S. Constitution are SUSPENDED or VOID. As noted above, it was traditionally flown over U.S. military buildings ONLY during wartime. Today this flag is now seen most commonly in U.S. COURTS and in the offices of POLITICIANS !!!!

That is why, if you dare to mention your Common Law or Constitutional rights in a COURT ROOM, the judge may tell you to “sit down and shut up!” Unbeknownst to you – and perhaps even your attorney – you are in a MILITARY-ADMIRALTY court of wartime where Common Law and the Constitution do NOT apply! That is why you can be fined or imprisoned by a judge’s “summary judgment”, without a “trial by jury”!  Surprise !!!!! Further, as noted above, if you happen to be granted the “privilege” of a “jury trial”, that verdict (whether guilty or not-guilty) is only “advisory” upon the court – the judge can rule as he wishes.

A “trial by jury” and a “jury trial” are obviously NOT the same entity: the former’s “Not Guilty” verdict is binding on that court; the latter’s “Not Guilty” ”verdict” is NOT binding upon that court and is legally considered ONLY an “advisory opinion” which the judge can accept or reject on a whim –, that is, in a “jury trial” the judge can find a defendant “guilty” by “Summary Judgment” even though the jury found him “Not Guilty”. In a true “trial by jury”, if the judge finds that a “guilty” verdict would result in a gross miscarriage of justice, he has several options: dismissal without prejudice (meaning the prosecutor can appeal that ruling and re-file the charges, requesting a retrial); or dismissal with prejudice (usually due to prosecutorial misconduct) which the prosecutor may not appeal and the defendant is free. But in a real “trial by jury” a judge may NEVER reverse a jury’s “Not Guilty” verdict and rule the defendant “Guilty”; nor may a prosecutor EVER appeal a jury’s “Not Guilty” verdict.

So, if you are ever in COURT – or ANY other government building – and see a gold-fringed flag, you have been WARNED !!! Under the international “Law of the Flag”, the gold-fringed U.S. military flag tells you that, should you decide to enter that courtroom, you have legally “boarded” a maritime vessel where ONLY Admiralty-Commercial Law applies; and that you have agreed to WAIVE your Common Law rights, as well as all protections afforded by the Constitution!!!

NOTE: In a courtroom – even if seen only on TV – did you ever notice the RAILING that separates the judge, prosecutor and defendant from the audience? That this railing closely resembles the railing of an old-style sailing ship is NOT an accident: by crossing through it, you leave behind the “law of the land” and board a vessel operating under the “law of the sea” or Commercial-Maritime Law. The gold-fringed flag near the judge’s bench serves as your second warning that, under the international Law of the Flag, you are about to cross over into the jurisdiction of international maritime-admiralty law.

++++++++++++++++++++ END OF ESSAY ++++++++++++++++++++

 

 

Advertisements

8 comments

  1. “UNITED STATES CODE

    TITLE 4

    CHAPTER 1 – THE FLAG

    §1. Flag; stripes and stars on

    The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field.

    § 2. Same; additional stars

    On the admission of a new State into the Union one star shall be added to the union of the flag; and such addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next succeeding such admission.”

    This blatantly defines how the flag of the united states is supposed to be made. No were in the there is a “civil flag” as you describe it. The Flag of the United States Customs Service is the one that was modified. The gold fringe on the flag, while yes is used in the military, is used for parade purposes only. It is also used on an indoor flag if authorized. Its not always used that way indoors.

    And in reading your essay…. I have one question. Why, oh why, would a court on land, for example in Kansas, fall under maritime law? Maritime Law is for ships out at sea. Not on land.

    1. 1.) Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, published in 1850 before the War Between The States has this description of the U.S. Civil Flag in the introduction, “The Custom House” —
      Start of Quote from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter
      “. . . Here, with a view from its front windows adown this not very enlivening prospect, and thence across the harbour, stands a spacious edifice of brick. From the loftiest point of its roof, during precisely three and a half hours of each forenoon, floats or droops, in breeze or calm, the banner of the republic; but with the thirteen stripes turned vertically, instead of horizontally, and thus indicating that a civil, and not a military, post of Uncle Sam’s government is here established. Its front is ornamented with a portico of half-a-dozen wooden pillars, supporting a balcony, beneath which a flight of wide granite steps descends towards the street Over the entrance hovers an enormous specimen of the American eagle, with outspread wings, a shield before her breast, and, if I recollect aright, a bunch of intermingled thunder- bolts and barbed arrows in each claw. With the customary infirmity of temper that characterizes this unhappy fowl, she appears by the fierceness of her beak and eye, and the general truculency of her attitude, to threaten mischief to the inoffensive community; and especially to warn all citizens careful of their safety against intruding on the premises which she overshadows with her wings. Nevertheless, vixenly as she looks, many people are seeking at this very moment to shelter themselves under the wing of the federal eagle; imagining, I presume, that her bosom has all the softness and snugness of an eiderdown pillow. But she has no great tenderness even in her best of moods, and, sooner or later — oftener soon than late — is apt to fling off her nestlings with a scratch of her claw, a dab of her beak, or a rankling wound from her barbed arrows.”
      End of Quote
      Sources: http://www.barefootsworld.net/uscivilflag.html AND
      http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/whchflag.shtml
      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      Before 1940, no U.S. flag, civil or military, flew within the forty-eight states except in federal settings and installations. Only state flags did. Since the 1935 institution of Social Security and the Buck Act of 1940, 4 U.S.C.S. Ch. 4 Sec. 104-113, by clever legal maneuvers the feds have entirely circumvented the U.S. Constitution, and have overlaid federal territorial jurisdiction on the sovereign States, bringing them under the admiralty/military jurisdiction of Law Merchant, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the law of Creditors and Debtors.

      Since then the U.S. military flag appears beside, or in place of, the state flags in nearly all locations within the states. All of the state courts and even the municipal ones now openly display it. In the last half century they have more openly declared the military/admiralty law jurisdiction with the addition of the gold fringe to the flag, the military flag of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

      As far as ALL government entities (e.g., courts) are concerned, there is now ONLY “CONTRACT LAW”. (Maritime-Admiralty Law; The Law Merchant). Further, this specific contract was created by Pres. Roosevelt following the 1933 BANKRUPTCY of the U.S. government. He pledged EVERYTHING in America to the International Bankers as SURETY for future loans to the U.S. government. The people literally own NOTHING – not even their bodies! In fact, if you are foolish enough to enter a courtroom, you enter as as DEBTOR (to the federal debt). And the DEBTOR always loses!!!!! If you get a speeding ticket for $250 dollars, that ticket is actually a CONTRACT OFFER, which you can accept or refuse. BUT you MUST refuse it in the proper way or the cops will soon be at your home.

      When Roosevelt stripped us of our rights and made us all debtors, he had to include a REMEDY for a man to refuse this contract offer (in this case, the $250 speeding ticket). He also had to create a TRUST in which each man or woman holds a BOND – an each of us has untold millions of dollars in our bond. The REMEDY is found under the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC).

      As an example, the Seventh Amendment reads, “”In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

      NOW, assume you get a TRAFFIC TICKET for $200.00 USD. Since $200 is greater than $20, you are entitled to a “trial by jury” of 12 peers according to the Common Law. Right? Well, just try asking the judge for a “trial by jury” of 12 peers. He will LAUGH at you!!! BUT, even if he is in a good mood and decides – at HIS DISCRETION – to grant you a trial, it will be a “Jury Trial” (which is DIFFERENT from a “trial by jury”!!), it will probably have 4-6 jurors at most, will NOT be conducted according to the Common Law (but rather by so-called “statutory law”), and EVEN IF the jury unanimously finds you “NOT GUILTY”, the judge can TOTALLY IGNORE their verdict and issue a binding verdict of “GUILTY”. In a true “trial by jury”, the jury’s decision (if found “not guilty” is final. But in a “jury trial” the jury’s verdict is only ADVISORY upon the judge. In short, the judge can ignore the jury and find you guilty or not guilty as he pleases!!! You see, you are in a Commercial Court (Contract Law court) which has been warped to take on most features of a Maritime-Admiralty Court. A Maritime-Admiralty Court used to be for offenses committed on the high seas. (There was a famous case on a ship in Boston Harbor in which the Navy claimed jurisdiction. However, because the ship was in port, the Massachusetts courts were given jurisdiction as if the defendant were on land.) NOW, the judge – much like the Captain of a ship on the high seas, can do pretty much what he wants. For example, he can issue a “summary judgment” against a defendant allowing little or no evidence.

      I have barely scratched the surface!!! But YES, in America we now have “Maritime-Admiralty Law” on LAND !!!!!

    1. Did you have a COMMENT?

  2. Freman lamar sr · · Reply

    Could you please email me a copy of this to lamar364@yahoo.com. thank you for the education open my eyes, wake up

    1. Just copy and paste it off my blog.

  3. New York · · Reply

    FYI: Go to the following site and enter the definitions to your site. I is most pleasing to answer questions correctly when you are dragged into one of those places under armed escorts with no duty to protect you people.

    1. Reply to “New York”:

      1.) I do NOT have a Facebook account. (Do you realize how many COMPANIES track you via Facebook?
      If NOT, please read please the article, “How to see all the companies tracking you on Facebook — and block them” by Jim Edwards (of “Business Insider” – http://www.BusinessInsider.com ) dated August 12, 2015

      Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/see-companies-tracking-facebook-block-123053940.html

      2.) I have BLOCKED Facebook on all of my own personal computers.

      3.) At the medical-health database programming company I and five partners own in Boston, we
      have BLOCKED all access to Facebook – and other purely “social web site” by our employees at
      our servers. If they want to look at Facebook, they are free do so at their HOMES.

      4.) Since I have been studying this stuff since the early 1970’s when I attended medical school in
      Washington, D.C and became as Civil War “buff” (since most battlefields were within a 1.5-hour drive or less
      from my house in Virginia), I found that to fully understand the root causes of that war, one had to go back to
      the America Colonial era and even British Common Law. That means over 40 years of researching this stuff, in addition to earning a Ph.D. degree in American history, with a specialization in “The Evolution of American Law-Political History from the Colonial Period Through the American Civil War”. (That was the title of my dissertation)

      5.) I have been in a “normal” court room (a Maritime-Admiralty court) only ONCE in my life as a participant in a case: when I got divorced and the settlement of property had ALREADY been agreed to by me and my ex-wife. With neither of us under “oath” (and an “oath” is a “commercial contract”, so I would NEVER agree to “swear an oath” to ANY court; and under international commercial law, there is NOTHING the judge can do to force you to do so!), the judge merely asked us if we both voluntarily agreed to the settlement. We both answered “Yes”; the judge stated “So ordered.” and we were out of there.

      6.) Since the early 1990’s I have NEVER paid a “parking ticket”, “speeding ticket”, etc., even though I have been issued quite a few by the local police, Massachusetts State Police, and various towns and cities (primarily “parking tickets”). Nor have I EVER gone to any federal court upon the receipt of a summons, court order, etc.

      Instead, weeks before any scheduled court appearance I, as a PRIVATE MAN, file a COUNTER-CLAIM against the police officer(s), prosecutor, judge, etc. in which I sue THEM (as PRIVATE MEN or WOMEN; NOT in their roles as officers or agents of the government). I do this writing out an “Affidavit of Truth” in which I challenge their PRESUMPTION that they possess JURISDICTION over me, the private man; and I listed each of my rights that was violated, along with the financial damages I seek to “make me whole”. They ALL make the PRESUMPTION that I have agreed (CONSENTED) to the various contracts (called legislated acts or statutes) that have been offered to me. Under international commercial law and American and British Common Law, any private man has the absolute right to contract with anyone else; or NOT to contract with anyone else. I challenge that presumption and thus their claimed jurisdiction over me in my
      “Affidavit of Truth” sworn under oath and notarized, in which I clearly state that I “assume total and unlimited commercial liability” (this statement is VITAL!) which I deliver to the court and all others involved in a case. By law, each one has between 7-14 days (my choice) to REBUT my affidavit item-my-item in their PRIVATE capacities as a man/woman; NOT as a government official or agent. Further, they each must also state in their “Affidavits of Rebuttal” that each of them “assumes total and unlimited commercial liability” for their affidavits and the outcome of the case – thus, waiving their “limited immunity” granted by their government office.

      If the do NOT each issue an “Affidavit of Rebuttal” within the time allotted – and they almost NEVER do so – then I have WON the case by default. The ancient Maxims of Law apply: “Silence is consent.”; “He, who does not object, consents.”; and “An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Law.” The case is over; I have won. By each NOT rebutting my counter-claim, they have in Law AGREED with everything in m affidavit. NO court in the world can intervene, since there is NO controversy.
      But what do I do when the police come to arrest me for “contempt of court” or some other nonsense? First, you peacefully allow them to UNLAWFULLY arrest you. Next, with just a few hours of paperwork, you can easily convert your “Affidavit of Truth” into a “COMMERCIAL LIEN”. It is an extra-judicial process and requires NO courts, lawyers, etc. (I have an article on “Commercial Liens: A Most Potent Weapon” by Alfred Adask on my blog. Let’s say that in your commercial lien, you demand $50 million from each man/woman named in your “COUNTER-CLAIM” for violating your rights without your having granted them that jurisdiction. If there were 5 people (the government agents, such as the police, prosecutor, judge, clerk of the court, etc), that is $250 million !!! Now, you do NOT really expect them to pay you, right? So, the COMMERCIAL LIEN does is “freezes” ALL of their assets, current and future – without your needing to take physical possession of anything. (By contrast, in a “mechanics lien”, someone who repaired your car and whom you refuse to pay the bill, can retain physical possession of your car until you pay – or he can have a sheriff auction it off to pay the car mechanic.) By “FREEZING” the assets of these 5 people, the can NOT sell an old car to buy a new one, sell their current house to buy a new one, take out a loan using anything the own as collateral, and so on. They are STUCK !!! And since, by NOT submitting rebuttals, they agreed with all you stated, so there is NO controversy. And NO court in the world can intervene in a situation where there is no controversy. And, as for the two policemen who later showed up at your house to arrest you, you simply write their names and addresses, along with a description of your unlawful arrest, on the back of the lien (actually a collection of all documents involved) and charged each of them $50 million as private men. Now, you are owed $350 million! And if ANYONE else, especially another judge, tries to interfere, you add that man/woman also!
      But what good is that, if you can NOT collect it? Good question, with an easy answer. If you REGISTER your lien with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), that lien then becomes a “negotiable instrument” – meaning it is now money!!! You can sell it to an investment bank (usually at 3-4% of its face value) or to anyone else interested in such investments – especially with the money and legal teams to actually force our 7 opponents to SELL all their property and possessions, plus attach all their future income! Or, ore likely, one investment company will sell to another investment company (for a small profit) or to its investor clients. But what about YOU? Well, if you sold the lien for 3% of its “face value” ($350 million) – which is a typical percentage for such liens, that means you received $10, 500,000 USD CASH for about 30 hours of paperwork. If you sold it for 4% of its $350 million “face value”, you received $14 million USD CASH. (And people wonder how these Wall Street lawyers specializing in commercial liens get so filthy rich!!!)
      The final “icing on the cake” is that, because our commercial lien was created to compensate for injuries done to you (charges filed against you based upon presumptions, without any evidence to prove those presumptions; unlawful arrest, etc.), its purpose was to “make you whole” through monetary restitution – which means that the money you receive by selling the lien is NOT taxable!!!
      And if you wanted to be REALLY “nasty”, you could donate the lien to the Vatican or the IRS. Not only will you get tax deductions so huge that you will NEVER have to pay any income taxes for the rest of your life, the VATICAN and IRS will pursue your opponents until the day they die! And a commercial lien is valid for 99 years! And, if placed into a TRUST, it is valid forever. And NO court in the world can void or over-turn a commercial lien.
      I have created commercial liens on several occasions, including against six (6) men working at Boston’s Logan Airport, employed as agents of DHS-CIS (Customs and Immigration Service). I wrote a brief account of the incident and the Commercial Lien Process (CAP) in an essay on this blog titled, “Donuts, the Customs-Immigration Service (CIS), and Commercial Liens”. It contains much more information than this reply. I also suggest that you read “COMMERCIAL LIENS: The MOST POTENT WEAPON” by Alfred Adask et al, 1995. One last note: Commercial liens used to be very common in America prior to World War 2; they were called , “The common man’s path to justice.” Today, only a very few “common men” even know of their existence and their power – probably in part because using the CAP process would take business away from licenses attorneys.

      John-Henry Hill, M.D.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: